Next: Databases of Matrix Groups
Up: Matrix Groups
Previous: Cohomology and Representations
The basic facilities provided by Magma for computing with matrix
groups over finite fields depend upon being able to construct a chain
of stabilizers. However, there are many examples of groups of moderately
small degree where we cannot find a suitable chain.
An on-going international research project seeks to develop algorithms
to explore the structure of such groups.
The main theoretical underpinning of the project comes from
the classification by Aschbacher (1984) of the (maximal)
subgroups of
into nine families. Much of the research
effort to date has been devoted to designing algorithms to decide
whether G belongs to one of the eight families whose
members have a normal subgroup preserving a ``natural
linear structure"; here, we plan to exploit this information
to explore G further, ultimately producing a
composition series for G.
-
Determine whether a group preserves a form modulo scalars.
-
The Niemeyer-Prager classical group recognition algorithm
as implemented in Magma by Alice Niemeyer and Anthony Pye.
-
Determine whether a subgroup G of
acts imprimitively
on the underlying vector space. a block system, respectively.
-
Test whether a matrix group G acts
as a semilinear group of automorphisms on some vector space.
-
Test whether a matrix group G preserves a non-trivial tensor
product decomposition.
-
Test whether a matrix group G is tensor-induced.
- Search for decompositions (corresponding to certain Aschbacher
families) with respect to the normal closure of a supplied subgroup.
-
The Glasby-Howlett algorithm to decide if the absolutely irreducible group
has an equivalent representation over a subfield
of K.
- Given a group G of
matrices over a finite field
E having degree e and a subfield F of E having degree f,
write G as a group generated by the matrices of G written as
matrices over F.
Next: Databases of Matrix Groups
Up: Matrix Groups
Previous: Cohomology and Representations