A family of hypergeometric motives can be determined by a coprime pair of products of cyclotomic polynomials, each product having the same degree d. For each t not 0, 1, or infinity, one can then (following Katz) associate a motive Mt to this data. At each prime p, one obtains an Euler factor by considering the monodromy action (over Qp) on the solution space of the associated hypergeometric differential equation. For good primes, this can be explicitly calculated by a trace formula (again see Katz). There are three kinds of bad primes. The wild primes are those which divide one of the indices of the cyclotomic polynomials. The tame primes are with vp(t) nonzero, and the "multiplicative" primes are those with vp(t – 1) nonzero. These last are the easiest to understand, in the complex case they correspond to the fact that there are (d – 1) independent holomorphic solutions about t = 1. Indeed, one can consider the formal motive M1 at t = 1 – as an example, in the case of Φ5 and Φ14, one obtains the weight 4 modular form of level 25.
We report specifically on a "database" of t = 1 degenerations, including all choices (about 1500 total) of cyclotomic data up through degree 6. In each case, we are able to numerically determine the wild Euler factors and verify the functional equation of the L-function to (say) 15 digits of precision. Of additional interest is the fact that approximately half the relevant (odd motivic weight) examples of even parity appear to have analytic rank 2.
I will describe a new formula for adding 2-coverings and 3-coverings of elliptic curves that avoids the need for any field extensions. By searching for rational points on the 6-coverings obtained, we can then find generators for the Mordell-Weil group of large height. However before searching for rational points, it helps to make a good choice of co-ordinates, by a combination of minimisation and reduction. I will discuss the minimisation problem for 6-coverings. In particular it turns out that adding a minimal 2-covering and a minimal 3-covering (using my formula) does not give a minimal 6-covering.